|
| THE DREAMERS (2004) |
Directed by Bernardo Bertolucci On DVD (*****)
|
 |
|  |
|
| Written By: John H. Foote
|
 |
The Dreamers (2004) arrives on DVD this week, one of the most
criminally under seen and under appreciated films of the last ten years.
Whenever Bernardo Bertolucci makes a film it is an event worth
celebrating because the man is a treasure of within the international
cinema. He provides full length directors commentary here that is a
lesson in filmmaking from this great master.
Bernardo Bertolucci has always been, to me, a director of remarkable
talent and immense courage. He is able to create films that are achingly
realistic, yet borne of a poetic beauty that transports the viewer to
the world being presented on the screen. Yet for all his gifts as a
visual director, Bertolucci has always possessed extraordinary talent
with his actors, coaching from some of the great performances of this
last quarter century.
Marlon Brando's searing work in Last Tango in Paris (1973) is without
question the actors finest performance, and easily among the finest
three performances committed to film. Placing trust in the actor,
Bertolucci allowed Brando to find purity in his work that had been sadly
missing for many years. A few years later he directed a clutch of actors
in the under appreciated epic, 1900 (1977), to some of the best work of
their career. I cannot remember seeing Burt Lancaster so bursting with
life as he was in 1900 (1977), or Donald Sutherland as perversely evil
as he was in the same film. Jill Clayburgh gave a stunning performance
as an incestuous mother in Luna (1979) a film so disturbing it was
initially banned in Ontario for a short time.
Bertolucci's greatest work remains Las Tango in Paris (1973) though
he is likely best remembered for The Last Emperor (1987) which won all
nine Academy Awards it was nominated for back in the late eighties. The
true story of Pu Yi, the last emperor of China, and the film is a superb
history lesson, a study in the human being as an enigma, and one of the
most beautiful films ever shot. Bertolucci won an Academy Award for best
director, as well as the Directors Guild Award for this film, which
despite the Oscars was something of a box office disappointment. In the
years to follow he has made such noble failures as The Sheltering Sky
(1990) which features a brilliant performance from the great Debra
Winger, and Little Buddha (1993) which was mishandled in release by
Miramax and Harvey Weinstein.
With The Dreamers, Bertolucci is back on the centre stage of world
cinema with a film that is likely to provoke severe criticism as well as
controversy. Never one to shy away from portraying sexuality in his
work, Bertolucci may have topped himself here with a frank yet honest
portrayal of incest that many viewers will no doubt find disturbing.
Based on the novel by Gilbert Adair, the film explores a popular
theme in cinema - an American, apparently an innocent, who is corrupted
by Europeans. In many ways the film has a great deal in common with Last
Tango in Paris (1973) in that we again have an American corrupted,
self-corrupted to a degree by Parisians. The major difference being of
course that Brando's character was already corrupted and perverse when
he arrived in Paris, and that his escape from grief came in the manner
of an affair with a young woman. To beat back his grief and inner
demons, he launched into a purely sexual affair with this young girl,
drawing her into his world and bringing with him all of the despair he
was living in. The young American in The Dreamers is not corrupt at the
film's beginning, but there is an innocence there that screams "corrupt
me!!".
Matthew (Michael Pitt) is a young American newly arrived in Paris
from San Diego, who seems to live at the Cinematheque, fuelling his
existence on great cinema. Our first encounter with him takes place in
the grand old cinema while watching a film directed by Samuel Fuller
from the fifties. Set in 1968, this was an extraordinary time to be a
cinephile as the world cinema was on the cusp of great change with films
becoming more courageous than ever before. French filmmakers Jean Luc
Godard and Francois Truffaut, former film critics, were in the process
of turning the film world upside down with their innovative new works
but also with their own appreciation of the American genres. .
Into Matthew's life come brother-sister twins Isabelle (Eva Green)
and Theo (Louis Garrel), who adopt the young American and introduce him
to their world. Little does he know, their world will turn his own
upside down, and he will embark on a journey of awakening and self
discovery that he will never be able to forget.
Matthew begins to suspect there is an incestuous relationship
between the brother and sister, and is brought into their odd game of
forfeits. The game consists of a series of movie question, and if you
fail the test, you must perform a demand made by the winning pair.
Eventually Matthew and Isabelle are involved in a sexual relationship,
having sex on the kitchen floor while Theo, close by cooks. In another
sequence, Theo is asked to masturbate while the other pair looks on in
apparent wonder. There is a dark perversity to the friendship that
simmers below the surface and always threatens to burst through forever
disrupting their lives. We suspect that Matthew is aware that the end of
the relationship is inevitable and while he enjoys the danger and the
sex, he cannot but know that the twins will merely move on to somebody
else when they are through with him. His error if falling in love with
the sister, unaware that she is acting out a game that he is very much a
part of.
The twins live in a fantasy world fuelled by their love for cinema
and American movies, but it is a world that is constantly threatening to
close in on them.
The sexuality within the film is presented very frankly and honestly,
as we see much move making but little actually love. In that is the
point of the film. The twins are incapable of loving anyone other than
one another because they have insulated themselves against the world but
done so into a world that does not exist as flesh but as celluloid.
The film walks a fine line between being great art (which I think it
is) and exploitive (which it will be accused of being). Yes there are
many shots of young, naked bodies, but the focus of the film is not
about the sex, but rather about how the sex impacts on their lives,
taking them into different worlds in the landscape of the minds. The
film is about change, both social and cinematic, and I cannot remember a
film that has fully explored the obsession with cinema as well, and as
disturbing as this. These young people live in the mind set of the
cinema, they half believe themselves to be characters in a film, and
that their lives are cinema, not necessarily real.
As usual, Bertolucci works wonders with his actors, particularly Eva
Green and Michael Pitt, who give excellent performance. What was
astounding to me was that they seemed so comfortable during the
prolonged nude scenes, as though moving about sans clothing were the
most natural thing in the world to them, which of course it is
considering the world they inhabit.
The DVD is presented in superb widescreen, and the cut here is the
NC-17 cut not released in theatres. The extras include the
aforementioned commentary from the director, a making of documentary and
an interesting little documentary about the events which shaped France
in 1968.
There will be critics and audiences horrified by what Bertolucci has
put up on the screen, but I defy them to find another director with the
courage of this Italian legend. I would prefer to see a film such as
this that did make me uncomfortable and uneasy than be spoon-fed drivel
such as The Matrix Revolutions (2003). The man is an artist, and among
the great artists of the modern cinema.
|
| © Copyright
2010 Hollywood North Magazine Inc. |
|
|